Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 295X2 outperforms GeForce 920M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 295X2 is 318 days older than GeForce 920M.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce 920M
- Consumes up to 93% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 295X2 - 33 vs 500 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 295X2
- Performs up to 33% better in The Callisto Protocol than GeForce 920M - 68 vs 51 FPS
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce 920M - 4 vs 2 GB
The Callisto Protocol
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
GeForce 920M
Mobile • Mar 13th, 2015
Radeon R9 295X2
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2014
Theoretical Performance
GeForce 920M
Mobile • Mar 13th, 2015
Pixel Fillrate
7.632 GPixel/s
11.714504988488104%
Texel Fillrate
30.53 GTexel/s
17.03683035714286%
Radeon R9 295X2
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2014
Pixel Fillrate
65.15 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
179.2 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce 920M | vs | AMD Radeon R9 295X2 |
|---|---|---|
Mar 13th, 2015 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2014 |
| GeForce 900M | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
| Not Available | MSRP | $1499 |
| None | Outputs | 1x DVI, 4x mini-DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | 3x 8-pin |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
| DDR3 | Type | GDDR5 |
| 64-bit | Bus | 512-bit |
| 14.4 GB/s | Bandwidth | 320 GB/s |
| 954 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1018 MHz |
| Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
| 900 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1250 MHz |
