Key Differences
In short — Radeon R7 265 outperforms GeForce 830M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R7 265 is 27 days older than GeForce 830M.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce 830M
- Consumes up to 78% less energy than AMD Radeon R7 265 - 33 vs 150 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R7 265
- Performs up to 5% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than GeForce 830M - 60 vs 57 FPS
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
GeForce 830M
Mobile • Mar 12th, 2014
Radeon R7 265
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2014
Theoretical Performance
Radeon R7 265
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2014
Pixel Fillrate
29.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
59.2 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce 830M | vs | AMD Radeon R7 265 |
|---|---|---|
Mar 12th, 2014 | Release Date | Feb 13th, 2014 |
| GeForce 800M | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
| Not Available | MSRP | $149 |
| None | Outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 GB | Memory | 2 GB |
| DDR3 | Type | GDDR5 |
| 64-bit | Bus | 256-bit |
| 14.4 GB/s | Bandwidth | 179.2 GB/s |
1082 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 900 MHz |
1150 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 925 MHz |
| 900 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1400 MHz |
