The Iris Pro Graphics 580 is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the Radeon R9 290. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Iris Pro Graphics 580
- Consumes up to 95% less energy – 15 vs 275 Watts
Advantages of the Radeon R9 290
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
Iris Pro Graphics 580 vs Radeon R9 290 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Iris Pro Graphics 580
Sep 1st, 2015
Average FPS
43
66%
Min 1% FPS
17
53%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock
Iris Pro Graphics 580 vs Radeon R9 290 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Iris Pro Graphics 580 vs Radeon R9 290 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Iris Pro Graphics 580 vs Radeon R9 290 in core GPU performance specifications
Iris Pro Graphics 580
Sep 1st, 2015
Memory
0 GB
0%
Memory Bandwidth
0 GB/s
0%
Pixel Fillrate
8.55 GPixel/s
14%
Texture Fillrate
68.4 GTexel/s
45%
FP32
1.094 TFLOPS
23%
Radeon R9 290
Nov 5th, 2013
Memory
4 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
320 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
60.61 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
151.5 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
4.849 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Iris Pro Graphics 580 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon R9 290 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2013 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $399.00 |
| HD Graphics-M | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
15 W | Power Consumption | 275 W |
| Memory | ||
| System-Shared | Memory Size | 4 GB |
| System-Shared | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
| System-Shared | Memory Bus | 512-bit |
| System-Shared | Bandwidth | 320 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 8.55 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 60.61 GPixel/s |
| 68.4 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 151.5 GTexel/s |
| 1.094 TFLOPS | FP32 | 4.849 TFLOPS |
