In Atomfall, the Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is same performance as the UHD Graphics 730. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
No clear advantages
UHD Graphics 730
- Is 7 years and 9 months newer – Mar 30, 2021 vs Jun 03, 2013
- Is 7 years and 9 months newer
- Consumes up to 67% less energy – 15 vs 45 Watts
- Consumes up to 67% less energy
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs UHD Graphics 730: Comparison of performance and price
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Jun 3rd, 2013
Average FPS
27 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
20 FPS
100%
Price, $
...
Value, $/FPS
...
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs UHD Graphics 730: Comparison of synthetic benchmarks
Performance Specifications
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs UHD Graphics 730: Comparison of core performance specifications
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Jun 3rd, 2013
Memory
0 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
0 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
4.6 GPixel/s
44%
Texture Fillrate
46 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
736 GFLOPS
100%
UHD Graphics 730
Mar 30th, 2021
Memory
0 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
0 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
10.4 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
15.6 GTexel/s
34%
FP32
499.2 GFLOPS
68%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Jun 3rd, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | UHD Graphics 730 Mar 30th, 2021 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 3rd, 2013 | Released | Mar 30th, 2021 |
| – | MSRP | – |
| HD Graphics (Haswell) | Generation | HD Graphics (Rocket Lake) |
Integrated | Segment | Integrated |
| 45 W | Power Consumption | 15 W |
