The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the Quadro P6000. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Iris Pro Graphics 5200
- Consumes up to 82% less energy – 45 vs 250 Watts
Advantages of the Quadro P6000
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Quadro P6000
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Jun 3rd, 2013
Average FPS
44
43%
Min 1% FPS
15
26%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Quadro P6000
Oct 1st, 2016
Average FPS
103
100%
Min 1% FPS
57
100%
Price, $
$999.96
100%
Value, $/FPS
$9.7/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
$999.96
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$999.96
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$999.96
In Stock
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Quadro P6000 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Quadro P6000 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Quadro P6000 in core GPU performance specifications
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Jun 3rd, 2013
Memory
0 GB
0%
Memory Bandwidth
0 GB/s
0%
Pixel Fillrate
4.6 GPixel/s
3%
Texture Fillrate
46 GTexel/s
12%
FP32
736 GFLOPS
6%
Quadro P6000
Oct 1st, 2016
Memory
24 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
432.8 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
157.9 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
394.8 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
12.63 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Quadro P6000 |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Jun 3rd, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 1st, 2016 |
Not Available | MSRP | $5,999.00 |
HD Graphics (Haswell) | Generation | Quadro Pascal (Px000) |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
45 W | Power Consumption | 250 W |
Memory | ||
System-Shared | Memory Size | 24 GB |
System-Shared | Memory Type | GDDR5X |
System-Shared | Memory Bus | 384-bit |
System-Shared | Bandwidth | 432.8 GB/s |
Theoretical Performance | ||
4.6 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 157.9 GPixel/s |
46 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 394.8 GTexel/s |
736 GFLOPS | FP32 | 12.63 TFLOPS |