In GRID, the Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is much slower than the GeForce RTX 5090. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
- Consumes up to 92% less energy – 45 vs 575 Watts
- Consumes up to 92% less energy
GeForce RTX 5090
- Up to 1510% faster in GRID – 483 vs 30 FPS
- Up to 1510% faster in GRID
- Is 11 years and 7 months newer – Jan 30, 2025 vs Jun 03, 2013
- Is 11 years and 7 months newer
GRID FPS Calculator
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs GeForce RTX 5090: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
GeForce RTX 5090
Jan 30th, 2025
Average FPS
483 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
291 FPS
100%
Price, $
$3499
100%
Value, $/FPS
$7.24/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs GeForce RTX 5090: Comparison of synthetic benchmarks
Performance Specifications
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs GeForce RTX 5090: Comparison of core performance specifications
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Jun 3rd, 2013
Memory
0 GB
0%
Memory Bandwidth
0 GB/s
0%
Pixel Fillrate
4.6 GPixel/s
1%
Texture Fillrate
46 GTexel/s
3%
FP32
736 GFLOPS
1%
GeForce RTX 5090
Jan 30th, 2025
Memory
32 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
1790 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
423.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
1636.8 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
104.8 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Jun 3rd, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | GeForce RTX 5090 Jan 30th, 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 3rd, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 30th, 2025 |
| – | MSRP | $1,999.00 |
| HD Graphics (Haswell) | Generation | GeForce 50 |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
45W | Power Consumption | 575W |
































































































































































