In Atomfall, the Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is much slower than the GeForce RTX 4080. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
- Consumes up to 86% less energy – 45 vs 320 Watts
- Consumes up to 86% less energy
GeForce RTX 4080
- Up to 458% faster in Atomfall – 145 vs 26 FPS
- Up to 458% faster in Atomfall
- Is 9 years and 3 months newer – Sep 20, 2022 vs Jun 03, 2013
- Is 9 years and 3 months newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs GeForce RTX 4080: Comparison of performance and price
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Jun 3rd, 2013
Average FPS
26 FPS
18%
Min 1% FPS
20 FPS
18%
Price, $
...
Value, $/FPS
...
All items are out of stock
GeForce RTX 4080
Sep 20th, 2022
Average FPS
145 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
109 FPS
100%
Price, $
$1497
100%
Value, $/FPS
$10.32/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs GeForce RTX 4080: Comparison of synthetic benchmarks
Performance Specifications
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs GeForce RTX 4080: Comparison of core performance specifications
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Jun 3rd, 2013
Memory
0 GB
0%
Memory Bandwidth
0 GB/s
0%
Pixel Fillrate
4.6 GPixel/s
2%
Texture Fillrate
46 GTexel/s
6%
FP32
736 GFLOPS
2%
GeForce RTX 4080
Sep 20th, 2022
Memory
16 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
716.8 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
280.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
761.5 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
48.74 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Jun 3rd, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | GeForce RTX 4080 Sep 20th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 3rd, 2013 | Released | Sep 20th, 2022 |
| – | MSRP | $1,199.00 |
| HD Graphics (Haswell) | Generation | GeForce 40 |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
45 W | Power Consumption | 320 W |
