In Control, the Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is quite a bit slower than the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
- Consumes up to 62% less energy – 45 vs 120 Watts
- Consumes up to 62% less energy
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
- Up to 50% faster in Control – 66 vs 44 FPS
- Up to 50% faster in Control
- Is 5 years and 8 months newer – Feb 22, 2019 vs Jun 03, 2013
- Is 5 years and 8 months newer
Control FPS Calculator
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti: Comparison of performance and price
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Jun 3rd, 2013
Average FPS
44 FPS
67%
Min 1% FPS
33 FPS
67%
Price, $
...
Value, $/FPS
...
All items are out of stock
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
Feb 22nd, 2019
Average FPS
66 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
49 FPS
100%
Price, $
$189.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.87/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti: Comparison of synthetic benchmarks
Performance Specifications
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti: Comparison of core performance specifications
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Jun 3rd, 2013
Memory
0 GB
0%
Memory Bandwidth
0 GB/s
0%
Pixel Fillrate
4.6 GPixel/s
5%
Texture Fillrate
46 GTexel/s
27%
FP32
736 GFLOPS
14%
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
Feb 22nd, 2019
Memory
6 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
288 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
84.96 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
169.9 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
5.437 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Jun 3rd, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Feb 22nd, 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 3rd, 2013 | Release Date | Feb 22nd, 2019 |
| – | MSRP | $279.00 |
| HD Graphics (Haswell) | Generation | GeForce 16 |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
45W | Power Consumption | 120W |
