In The Last of Us Part I, the Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is much slower than the GeForce GTX 1650. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
- Consumes up to 40% less energy – 45 vs 75 Watts
- Consumes up to 40% less energy
GeForce GTX 1650
- Up to 800% faster in The Last of Us Part I – 9 vs 1 FPS
- Up to 800% faster in The Last of Us Part I
- Is 5 years and 10 months newer – Apr 23, 2019 vs Jun 03, 2013
- Is 5 years and 10 months newer
The Last of Us Part I FPS Calculator
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs GeForce GTX 1650: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
GeForce GTX 1650
Apr 23rd, 2019
Average FPS
9 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
3 FPS
100%
Price, $
$249.98
100%
Value, $/FPS
$27.77/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs GeForce GTX 1650: Comparison of synthetic benchmarks
Performance Specifications
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs GeForce GTX 1650: Comparison of core performance specifications
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Jun 3rd, 2013
Memory
0 GB
0%
Memory Bandwidth
0 GB/s
0%
Pixel Fillrate
4.6 GPixel/s
9%
Texture Fillrate
46 GTexel/s
49%
FP32
736 GFLOPS
25%
GeForce GTX 1650
Apr 23rd, 2019
Memory
4 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
128.1 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
53.28 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
93.24 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
2.984 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Jun 3rd, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | GeForce GTX 1650 Apr 23rd, 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 3rd, 2013 | Released | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
| – | MSRP | $149.00 |
| HD Graphics (Haswell) | Generation | GeForce 16 |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
45 W | Power Consumption | 75 W |
