In GRID, the Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is same performance as the GeForce GTS 450. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
- Is 2 years and 8 months newer – Jun 03, 2013 vs Sep 13, 2010
- Is 2 years and 8 months newer
- Consumes up to 58% less energy – 45 vs 106 Watts
- Consumes up to 58% less energy
GeForce GTS 450
No clear advantages
GRID FPS Calculator
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs GeForce GTS 450: Comparison of performance and price
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Jun 3rd, 2013
Average FPS
30 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
22 FPS
100%
Price, $
...
Value, $/FPS
...
All items are out of stock
GeForce GTS 450
Sep 13th, 2010
Average FPS
30 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
22 FPS
100%
Price, $
$145.62
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.85/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs GeForce GTS 450: Comparison of synthetic benchmarks
Performance Specifications
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs GeForce GTS 450: Comparison of core performance specifications
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Jun 3rd, 2013
Memory
0 GB
0%
Memory Bandwidth
0 GB/s
0%
Pixel Fillrate
4.6 GPixel/s
73%
Texture Fillrate
46 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
736 GFLOPS
100%
GeForce GTS 450
Sep 13th, 2010
Memory
1 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
57.73 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
6.264 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
25.06 GTexel/s
54%
FP32
601.3 GFLOPS
82%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Jun 3rd, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | GeForce GTS 450 Sep 13th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jun 3rd, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 13th, 2010 |
| – | MSRP | $129.00 |
| HD Graphics (Haswell) | Generation | GeForce 400 |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
45W | Power Consumption | 106W |
