In Atomfall, the Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is much faster than the GeForce GT 540M. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
- Up to 108% faster in Atomfall – 27 vs 13 FPS
- Up to 108% faster in Atomfall
- Is 2 years and 4 months newer – Jun 03, 2013 vs Jan 05, 2011
- Is 2 years and 4 months newer
GeForce GT 540M
- Consumes up to 22% less energy – 35 vs 45 Watts
- Consumes up to 22% less energy
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs GeForce GT 540M: Comparison of performance and price
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Jun 3rd, 2013
Average FPS
27 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
20 FPS
100%
Price, $
...
Value, $/FPS
...
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs GeForce GT 540M: Comparison of synthetic benchmarks
Performance Specifications
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs GeForce GT 540M: Comparison of core performance specifications
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Jun 3rd, 2013
Memory
0 GB
0%
Memory Bandwidth
0 GB/s
0%
Pixel Fillrate
4.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
46 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
736 GFLOPS
100%
GeForce GT 540M
Jan 5th, 2011
Memory
1 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
28.8 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
2.688 GPixel/s
58%
Texture Fillrate
10.75 GTexel/s
23%
FP32
258 GFLOPS
35%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Jun 3rd, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | GeForce GT 540M Jan 5th, 2011 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jun 3rd, 2013 | Released | Jan 5th, 2011 |
| – | MSRP | – |
| HD Graphics (Haswell) | Generation | GeForce 500M |
Integrated | Segment | Laptop |
| 45 W | Power Consumption | 35 W |
