In Atomfall, the Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is faster than the GeForce GT 445M. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
- Up to 17% faster in Atomfall – 27 vs 23 FPS
- Up to 17% faster in Atomfall
- Is 2 years and 8 months newer – Jun 03, 2013 vs Sep 03, 2010
- Is 2 years and 8 months newer
GeForce GT 445M
- Consumes up to 22% less energy – 35 vs 45 Watts
- Consumes up to 22% less energy
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs GeForce GT 445M: Comparison of performance and price
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Jun 3rd, 2013
Average FPS
27 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
20 FPS
100%
Price, $
...
Value, $/FPS
...
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs GeForce GT 445M: Comparison of synthetic benchmarks
Performance Specifications
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs GeForce GT 445M: Comparison of core performance specifications
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Jun 3rd, 2013
Memory
0 GB
0%
Memory Bandwidth
0 GB/s
0%
Pixel Fillrate
4.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
46 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
736 GFLOPS
100%
GeForce GT 445M
Sep 3rd, 2010
Memory
3 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
38.4 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
3.54 GPixel/s
77%
Texture Fillrate
14.16 GTexel/s
31%
FP32
339.8 GFLOPS
46%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Jun 3rd, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | GeForce GT 445M Sep 3rd, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jun 3rd, 2013 | Released | Sep 3rd, 2010 |
| – | MSRP | – |
| HD Graphics (Haswell) | Generation | GeForce 400M |
Integrated | Segment | Laptop |
| 45 W | Power Consumption | 35 W |
