In Atomfall, the Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is much faster than the GeForce GT 430. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
- Up to 440% faster in Atomfall – 27 vs 5 FPS
- Up to 440% faster in Atomfall
- Is 2 years and 7 months newer – Jun 03, 2013 vs Oct 11, 2010
- Is 2 years and 7 months newer
- Consumes up to 8% less energy – 45 vs 49 Watts
- Consumes up to 8% less energy
GeForce GT 430
No clear advantages
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs GeForce GT 430: Comparison of performance and price
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Jun 3rd, 2013
Average FPS
27 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
20 FPS
100%
Price, $
...
Value, $/FPS
...
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs GeForce GT 430: Comparison of synthetic benchmarks
Performance Specifications
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs GeForce GT 430: Comparison of core performance specifications
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Jun 3rd, 2013
Memory
0 GB
0%
Memory Bandwidth
0 GB/s
0%
Pixel Fillrate
4.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
46 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
736 GFLOPS
100%
GeForce GT 430
Oct 11th, 2010
Memory
0.5 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
12.8 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
2.8 GPixel/s
61%
Texture Fillrate
11.2 GTexel/s
24%
FP32
268.8 GFLOPS
37%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Jun 3rd, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | GeForce GT 430 Oct 11th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jun 3rd, 2013 | Released | Oct 11th, 2010 |
| – | MSRP | $79.00 |
| HD Graphics (Haswell) | Generation | GeForce 400 |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
45 W | Power Consumption | 49 W |
