In The Last of Us Part II, the Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is same performance as the GeForce GT 1030. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
No clear advantages
GeForce GT 1030
- Is 3 years and 11 months newer – May 17, 2017 vs Jun 03, 2013
- Is 3 years and 11 months newer
- Consumes up to 33% less energy – 30 vs 45 Watts
- Consumes up to 33% less energy
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs GeForce GT 1030: Comparison of performance and price
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Jun 3rd, 2013
Average FPS
1 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
1 FPS
100%
Price, $
...
Value, $/FPS
...
All items are out of stock
GeForce GT 1030
May 17th, 2017
Average FPS
1 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
1 FPS
100%
Price, $
$79.98
100%
Value, $/FPS
$79.98/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs GeForce GT 1030: Comparison of synthetic benchmarks
Performance Specifications
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs GeForce GT 1030: Comparison of core performance specifications
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Jun 3rd, 2013
Memory
0 GB
0%
Memory Bandwidth
0 GB/s
0%
Pixel Fillrate
4.6 GPixel/s
20%
Texture Fillrate
46 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
736 GFLOPS
65%
GeForce GT 1030
May 17th, 2017
Memory
2 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
48.06 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
23.49 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
35.23 GTexel/s
77%
FP32
1.1274000000000002 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Jun 3rd, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | GeForce GT 1030 May 17th, 2017 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 3rd, 2013 | Released | May 17th, 2017 |
| – | MSRP | $79.00 |
| HD Graphics (Haswell) | Generation | GeForce 10 |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
| 45 W | Power Consumption | 30 W |
