In Atomfall, the Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is much slower than the Arc B580. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
- Consumes up to 76% less energy – 45 vs 190 Watts
- Consumes up to 76% less energy
Arc B580
- Up to 227% faster in Atomfall – 85 vs 26 FPS
- Up to 227% faster in Atomfall
- Is 11 years and 6 months newer – Dec 13, 2024 vs Jun 03, 2013
- Is 11 years and 6 months newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Arc B580: Comparison of performance and price
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Jun 3rd, 2013
Average FPS
26 FPS
31%
Min 1% FPS
20 FPS
31%
Price, $
...
Value, $/FPS
...
All items are out of stock
Arc B580
Dec 13th, 2024
Average FPS
85 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
64 FPS
100%
Price, $
$299.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.52/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Arc B580: Comparison of synthetic benchmarks
Performance Specifications
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Arc B580: Comparison of core performance specifications
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Jun 3rd, 2013
Memory
0 GB
0%
Memory Bandwidth
0 GB/s
0%
Pixel Fillrate
4.6 GPixel/s
2%
Texture Fillrate
46 GTexel/s
11%
FP32
736 GFLOPS
5%
Arc B580
Dec 13th, 2024
Memory
12 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
456 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
213.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
427.2 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
13.67 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Jun 3rd, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Arc B580 Dec 13th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 3rd, 2013 | Released | Dec 13th, 2024 |
| – | MSRP | $249.00 |
| HD Graphics (Haswell) | Generation | Battlemage (Arc 5) |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
45 W | Power Consumption | 190 W |
