In Rust, the Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is quite a bit slower than the Arc B570. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
- Consumes up to 70% less energy – 45 vs 150 Watts
- Consumes up to 70% less energy
Arc B570
- Up to 89% faster in Rust – 172 vs 91 FPS
- Up to 89% faster in Rust
- Is 11 years and 7 months newer – Jan 16, 2025 vs Jun 03, 2013
- Is 11 years and 7 months newer
Rust FPS Calculator
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Arc B570: Comparison of performance and price
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Jun 3rd, 2013
Average FPS
91 FPS
53%
Min 1% FPS
68 FPS
55%
Price, $
...
Value, $/FPS
...
All items are out of stock
Arc B570
Jan 16th, 2025
Average FPS
172 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
123 FPS
100%
Price, $
$230.23
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.33/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Arc B570: Comparison of synthetic benchmarks
Performance Specifications
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Arc B570: Comparison of core performance specifications
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Jun 3rd, 2013
Memory
0 GB
0%
Memory Bandwidth
0 GB/s
0%
Pixel Fillrate
4.6 GPixel/s
2%
Texture Fillrate
46 GTexel/s
13%
FP32
736 GFLOPS
6%
Arc B570
Jan 16th, 2025
Memory
10 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
380 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
200 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
360 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
11.52 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Jun 3rd, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Arc B570 Jan 16th, 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 3rd, 2013 | Released | Jan 16th, 2025 |
| – | MSRP | $219.00 |
| HD Graphics (Haswell) | Generation | Battlemage (Arc 5) |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
45 W | Power Consumption | 150 W |
