In Dragon's Dogma 2, the Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is much slower than the Arc A770M. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
- Consumes up to 62% less energy – 45 vs 120 Watts
- Consumes up to 62% less energy
Arc A770M
- Up to 118% faster in Dragon's Dogma 2 – 83 vs 38 FPS
- Up to 118% faster in Dragon's Dogma 2
Dragon's Dogma 2 FPS Calculator
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Arc A770M: Comparison of performance and price
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Jun 3rd, 2013
Average FPS
38 FPS
46%
Min 1% FPS
28 FPS
47%
Price, $
...
Value, $/FPS
...
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Arc A770M: Comparison of synthetic benchmarks
Performance Specifications
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Arc A770M: Comparison of core performance specifications
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Jun 3rd, 2013
Memory
0 GB
0%
Memory Bandwidth
0 GB/s
0%
Pixel Fillrate
4.6 GPixel/s
2%
Texture Fillrate
46 GTexel/s
9%
FP32
736 GFLOPS
4%
Arc A770M
Memory
16 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
512 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
262.4 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
524.8 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
16.79 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Jun 3rd, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Arc A770M |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 3rd, 2013 | Release Date | – |
| – | MSRP | – |
| HD Graphics (Haswell) | Generation | Alchemist (Arc 7 Mobile) |
Integrated | Segment | Laptop |
45W | Power Consumption | 120W |
