In Control, the Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is much slower than the Arc A770. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
- Consumes up to 80% less energy – 45 vs 225 Watts
- Consumes up to 80% less energy
Arc A770
- Up to 114% faster in Control – 94 vs 44 FPS
- Up to 114% faster in Control
- Is 9 years and 4 months newer – Oct 12, 2022 vs Jun 03, 2013
- Is 9 years and 4 months newer
Control FPS Calculator
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Arc A770: Comparison of performance and price
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Jun 3rd, 2013
Average FPS
44 FPS
47%
Min 1% FPS
33 FPS
47%
Price, $
...
Value, $/FPS
...
All items are out of stock
Arc A770
Oct 12th, 2022
Average FPS
94 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
70 FPS
100%
Price, $
$279.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.97/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Arc A770: Comparison of synthetic benchmarks
Performance Specifications
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Arc A770: Comparison of core performance specifications
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Jun 3rd, 2013
Memory
0 GB
0%
Memory Bandwidth
0 GB/s
0%
Pixel Fillrate
4.6 GPixel/s
1%
Texture Fillrate
46 GTexel/s
7%
FP32
736 GFLOPS
4%
Arc A770
Oct 12th, 2022
Memory
16 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
512 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
307.2 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
614.4 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
19.66 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Jun 3rd, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Arc A770 Oct 12th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 3rd, 2013 | Released | Oct 12th, 2022 |
| – | MSRP | $329.00 |
| HD Graphics (Haswell) | Generation | Alchemist (Arc 7) |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
45 W | Power Consumption | 225 W |
