In Atomfall, the Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is much slower than the Arc A730M. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
- Consumes up to 44% less energy – 45 vs 80 Watts
- Consumes up to 44% less energy
Arc A730M
- Up to 126% faster in Atomfall – 61 vs 27 FPS
- Up to 126% faster in Atomfall
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Arc A730M: Comparison of performance and price
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Jun 3rd, 2013
Average FPS
27 FPS
44%
Min 1% FPS
20 FPS
43%
Price, $
...
Value, $/FPS
...
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Arc A730M: Comparison of synthetic benchmarks
Performance Specifications
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Arc A730M: Comparison of core performance specifications
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Jun 3rd, 2013
Memory
0 GB
0%
Memory Bandwidth
0 GB/s
0%
Pixel Fillrate
4.6 GPixel/s
2%
Texture Fillrate
46 GTexel/s
12%
FP32
736 GFLOPS
6%
Arc A730M
Memory
12 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
336 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
196.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
393.6 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
12.6 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Jun 3rd, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Arc A730M |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 3rd, 2013 | Released | – |
| – | MSRP | – |
| HD Graphics (Haswell) | Generation | Alchemist (Arc 7 Mobile) |
Integrated | Segment | Laptop |
45 W | Power Consumption | 80 W |
