In No Man's Sky, the Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is much slower than the Arc A550M. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
- Consumes up to 25% less energy – 45 vs 60 Watts
- Consumes up to 25% less energy
Arc A550M
- Up to 130% faster in No Man's Sky – 161 vs 70 FPS
- Up to 130% faster in No Man's Sky
No Man's Sky FPS Calculator
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Arc A550M: Comparison of performance and price
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Jun 3rd, 2013
Average FPS
70 FPS
43%
Min 1% FPS
35 FPS
30%
Price, $
...
Value, $/FPS
...
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Arc A550M: Comparison of synthetic benchmarks
Performance Specifications
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Arc A550M: Comparison of core performance specifications
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Jun 3rd, 2013
Memory
0 GB
0%
Memory Bandwidth
0 GB/s
0%
Pixel Fillrate
4.6 GPixel/s
4%
Texture Fillrate
46 GTexel/s
18%
FP32
736 GFLOPS
9%
Arc A550M
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
224 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
131.2 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
262.4 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
8.397 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Jun 3rd, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Arc A550M |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 3rd, 2013 | Release Date | – |
| – | MSRP | – |
| HD Graphics (Haswell) | Generation | Alchemist (Arc 5 Mobile) |
Integrated | Segment | Laptop |
45W | Power Consumption | 60W |
