In Rust, the Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is quite a bit slower than the Arc A380. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
- Consumes up to 40% less energy – 45 vs 75 Watts
- Consumes up to 40% less energy
Arc A380
- Up to 42% faster in Rust – 132 vs 93 FPS
- Up to 42% faster in Rust
- Is 9 years and 10 days newer – Jun 14, 2022 vs Jun 03, 2013
- Is 9 years and 10 days newer
Rust FPS Calculator
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Arc A380: Comparison of performance and price
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Jun 3rd, 2013
Average FPS
93 FPS
70%
Min 1% FPS
69 FPS
70%
Price, $
...
Value, $/FPS
...
All items are out of stock
Arc A380
Jun 14th, 2022
Average FPS
132 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
99 FPS
100%
Price, $
$149.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.13/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Arc A380: Comparison of synthetic benchmarks
Performance Specifications
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Arc A380: Comparison of core performance specifications
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Jun 3rd, 2013
Memory
0 GB
0%
Memory Bandwidth
0 GB/s
0%
Pixel Fillrate
4.6 GPixel/s
7%
Texture Fillrate
46 GTexel/s
35%
FP32
736 GFLOPS
18%
Arc A380
Jun 14th, 2022
Memory
6 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
186 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
65.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
131.2 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
4.198 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Jun 3rd, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Arc A380 Jun 14th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 3rd, 2013 | Released | Jun 14th, 2022 |
| – | MSRP | $149.00 |
| HD Graphics (Haswell) | Generation | Alchemist (Arc 3) |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
45 W | Power Consumption | 75 W |






















































































































































