The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the Arc A310. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Iris Pro Graphics 5200
The Arc A310 is better in every way
Advantages of the Arc A310
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 33% less energy – 30 vs 45 Watts
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Arc A310
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Jun 3rd, 2013
Average FPS
43
69%
Min 1% FPS
15
54%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Buy on Amazon
$129.99
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
N/A
Out of Stock
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Arc A310 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Arc A310 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Arc A310 in core GPU performance specifications
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Jun 3rd, 2013
Memory
0 GB
0%
Memory Bandwidth
0 GB/s
0%
Pixel Fillrate
4.6 GPixel/s
16%
Texture Fillrate
46 GTexel/s
82%
FP32
736 GFLOPS
27%
Arc A310
Oct 12th, 2022
Memory
4 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
124 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
28 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
56 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
2.688 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Arc A310 |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Jun 3rd, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2022 |
Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
HD Graphics (Haswell) | Generation | Alchemist (Arc 3) |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
45 W | Power Consumption | 30 W |
Memory | ||
System-Shared | Memory Size | 4 GB |
System-Shared | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
System-Shared | Memory Bus | 64-bit |
System-Shared | Bandwidth | 124 GB/s |
Theoretical Performance | ||
4.6 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 28 GPixel/s |
46 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 56 GTexel/s |
736 GFLOPS | FP32 | 2.688 TFLOPS |