The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Mobile is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the Radeon RX 560 XT. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Mobile
- Consumes up to 80% less energy – 30 vs 150 Watts
Advantages of the Radeon RX 560 XT
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Mobile vs Radeon RX 560 XT
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Mobile
May 27th, 2013
Average FPS
44
66%
Min 1% FPS
15
48%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Radeon RX 560 XT
Mar 13th, 2019
Average FPS
67
100%
Min 1% FPS
31
100%
Price, $
$101.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.52/FPS
100%
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Mobile vs Radeon RX 560 XT in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Mobile vs Radeon RX 560 XT in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Mobile vs Radeon RX 560 XT in core GPU performance specifications
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Mobile
May 27th, 2013
Memory
0 GB
0%
Memory Bandwidth
0 GB/s
0%
Pixel Fillrate
4.8 GPixel/s
12%
Texture Fillrate
48 GTexel/s
35%
FP32
768 GFLOPS
17%
Radeon RX 560 XT
Mar 13th, 2019
Memory
4 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
224 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
39.23 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
137.3 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
4.394 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Mobile | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon RX 560 XT |
---|---|---|
General | ||
May 27th, 2013 | Release Date | Mar 13th, 2019 |
Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
HD Graphics-M (Haswell) | Generation | Polaris (RX 500) |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
30 W | Power Consumption | 150 W |
Memory | ||
System-Shared | Memory Size | 4 GB |
System-Shared | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
System-Shared | Memory Bus | 256-bit |
System-Shared | Bandwidth | 224 GB/s |
Theoretical Performance | ||
4.8 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 39.23 GPixel/s |
48 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 137.3 GTexel/s |
768 GFLOPS | FP32 | 4.394 TFLOPS |