The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Mobile is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the Quadro P620. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Mobile
- Consumes up to 25% less energy – 30 vs 40 Watts
Advantages of the Quadro P620
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Mobile vs Quadro P620
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Mobile
May 27th, 2013
Average FPS
43
84%
Min 1% FPS
15
75%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Mobile vs Quadro P620 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Mobile vs Quadro P620 in core GPU performance specifications
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Mobile
May 27th, 2013
Memory
0 GB
0%
Memory Bandwidth
0 GB/s
0%
Pixel Fillrate
4.8 GPixel/s
22%
Texture Fillrate
48 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
768 GFLOPS
55%
Quadro P620
Feb 1st, 2018
Memory
2 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
80.13 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
21.66 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
43.33 GTexel/s
90%
FP32
1.3865 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Mobile | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Quadro P620 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| May 27th, 2013 | Release Date | Feb 1st, 2018 |
| Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
| HD Graphics-M (Haswell) | Generation | Quadro Pascal (Px200) |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
30 W | Power Consumption | 40 W |
| Memory | ||
| System-Shared | Memory Size | 2 GB |
| System-Shared | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
| System-Shared | Memory Bus | 128-bit |
| System-Shared | Bandwidth | 80.13 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 4.8 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 21.66 GPixel/s |
48 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 43.33 GTexel/s |
| 768 GFLOPS | FP32 | 1.3865 TFLOPS |
