In Atomfall, the Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Mobile is slower than the GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Mobile
- Consumes up to 40% less energy – 30 vs 50 Watts
- Consumes up to 40% less energy
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
- Up to 30% faster in Atomfall – 35 vs 27 FPS
- Up to 30% faster in Atomfall
- Is 6 years and 10 months newer – Apr 02, 2020 vs May 27, 2013
- Is 6 years and 10 months newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Mobile vs GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q: Comparison of performance and price
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Mobile
May 27th, 2013
Average FPS
27 FPS
77%
Min 1% FPS
20 FPS
77%
Price, $
...
Value, $/FPS
...
All items are out of stock
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
Apr 2nd, 2020
Average FPS
35 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
26 FPS
100%
Price, $
...
Value, $/FPS
...
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Mobile vs GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q: Comparison of synthetic benchmarks
Performance Specifications
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Mobile vs GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q: Comparison of core performance specifications
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Mobile
May 27th, 2013
Memory
0 GB
0%
Memory Bandwidth
0 GB/s
0%
Pixel Fillrate
4.8 GPixel/s
12%
Texture Fillrate
48 GTexel/s
62%
FP32
768 GFLOPS
31%
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
Apr 2nd, 2020
Memory
4 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
160 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
38.4 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
76.8 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
2.458 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Mobile May 27th, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q Apr 2nd, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| May 27th, 2013 | Released | Apr 2nd, 2020 |
| – | MSRP | – |
| HD Graphics-M (Haswell) | Generation | GeForce 16 Mobile |
Integrated | Segment | Laptop |
30 W | Power Consumption | 50 W |
