In Atomfall, the Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Mobile is much faster than the GeForce GT 540M. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Mobile
- Up to 108% faster in Atomfall – 27 vs 13 FPS
- Up to 108% faster in Atomfall
- Is 2 years and 4 months newer – May 27, 2013 vs Jan 05, 2011
- Is 2 years and 4 months newer
- Consumes up to 14% less energy – 30 vs 35 Watts
- Consumes up to 14% less energy
GeForce GT 540M
No clear advantages
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Mobile vs GeForce GT 540M: Comparison of performance and price
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Mobile
May 27th, 2013
Average FPS
27 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
20 FPS
100%
Price, $
...
Value, $/FPS
...
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Mobile vs GeForce GT 540M: Comparison of synthetic benchmarks
Performance Specifications
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Mobile vs GeForce GT 540M: Comparison of core performance specifications
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Mobile
May 27th, 2013
Memory
0 GB
0%
Memory Bandwidth
0 GB/s
0%
Pixel Fillrate
4.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
48 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
768 GFLOPS
100%
GeForce GT 540M
Jan 5th, 2011
Memory
1 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
28.8 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
2.688 GPixel/s
56%
Texture Fillrate
10.75 GTexel/s
22%
FP32
258 GFLOPS
34%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Mobile May 27th, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | GeForce GT 540M Jan 5th, 2011 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
May 27th, 2013 | Released | Jan 5th, 2011 |
| – | MSRP | – |
| HD Graphics-M (Haswell) | Generation | GeForce 500M |
Integrated | Segment | Laptop |
30 W | Power Consumption | 35 W |
