In Atomfall, the Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Mobile is much faster than the GeForce 610M. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Mobile
- Up to 125% faster in Atomfall – 27 vs 12 FPS
- Up to 125% faster in Atomfall
- Is 1 year and 5 months newer – May 27, 2013 vs Dec 01, 2011
- Is 1 year and 5 months newer
GeForce 610M
- Consumes up to 60% less energy – 12 vs 30 Watts
- Consumes up to 60% less energy
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Mobile vs GeForce 610M: Comparison of performance and price
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Mobile
May 27th, 2013
Average FPS
27 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
20 FPS
100%
Price, $
...
Value, $/FPS
...
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Mobile vs GeForce 610M: Comparison of synthetic benchmarks
Performance Specifications
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Mobile vs GeForce 610M: Comparison of core performance specifications
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Mobile
May 27th, 2013
Memory
0 GB
0%
Memory Bandwidth
0 GB/s
0%
Pixel Fillrate
4.8 GPixel/s
96%
Texture Fillrate
48 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
768 GFLOPS
100%
GeForce 610M
Dec 1st, 2011
Memory
1 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
14.4 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
5 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
5 GTexel/s
10%
FP32
120 GFLOPS
16%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Mobile May 27th, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | GeForce 610M Dec 1st, 2011 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
May 27th, 2013 | Released | Dec 1st, 2011 |
| – | MSRP | – |
| HD Graphics-M (Haswell) | Generation | GeForce 600M |
Integrated | Segment | Laptop |
| 30 W | Power Consumption | 12 W |
