In Atomfall, the Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Mobile is much faster than the GeForce 410M. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Mobile
- Up to 125% faster in Atomfall – 27 vs 12 FPS
- Up to 125% faster in Atomfall
- Is 2 years and 4 months newer – May 27, 2013 vs Jan 05, 2011
- Is 2 years and 4 months newer
GeForce 410M
- Consumes up to 60% less energy – 12 vs 30 Watts
- Consumes up to 60% less energy
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Mobile vs GeForce 410M: Comparison of performance and price
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Mobile
May 27th, 2013
Average FPS
27 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
20 FPS
100%
Price, $
...
Value, $/FPS
...
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Mobile vs GeForce 410M: Comparison of synthetic benchmarks
Performance Specifications
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Mobile vs GeForce 410M: Comparison of core performance specifications
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Mobile
May 27th, 2013
Memory
0 GB
0%
Memory Bandwidth
0 GB/s
0%
Pixel Fillrate
4.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
48 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
768 GFLOPS
100%
GeForce 410M
Jan 5th, 2011
Memory
1 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
12.8 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
1.148 GPixel/s
24%
Texture Fillrate
4.592 GTexel/s
10%
FP32
110.1 GFLOPS
14%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Mobile May 27th, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | GeForce 410M Jan 5th, 2011 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
May 27th, 2013 | Released | Jan 5th, 2011 |
| – | MSRP | – |
| HD Graphics-M (Haswell) | Generation | GeForce 400M |
Integrated | Segment | Laptop |
| 30 W | Power Consumption | 12 W |
