The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Mobile is a slightly faster gaming GPU than the GeForce 210. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Mobile
- A slightly faster GPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 3% less energy – 30 vs 31 Watts
Advantages of the GeForce 210
The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Mobile is better in every way
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Mobile vs GeForce 210
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Mobile
May 27th, 2013
Average FPS
43
100%
Min 1% FPS
15
100%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
GeForce 210
Oct 12th, 2009
Average FPS
43
100%
Min 1% FPS
15
100%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Mobile vs GeForce 210 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Mobile vs GeForce 210 in core GPU performance specifications
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Mobile
May 27th, 2013
Memory
0 GB
0%
Memory Bandwidth
0 GB/s
0%
Pixel Fillrate
4.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
48 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
768 GFLOPS
100%
GeForce 210
Oct 12th, 2009
Memory
0.5 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
6.4 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
2.08 GPixel/s
43%
Texture Fillrate
4.16 GTexel/s
9%
FP32
39.36 GFLOPS
5%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Mobile | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce 210 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
May 27th, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2009 |
| Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
| HD Graphics-M (Haswell) | Generation | GeForce 200 |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
30 W | Power Consumption | 31 W |
| Memory | ||
| System-Shared | Memory Size | 0.5 GB |
| System-Shared | Memory Type | DDR3 |
| System-Shared | Memory Bus | 64-bit |
| System-Shared | Bandwidth | 6.4 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
4.8 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 2.08 GPixel/s |
48 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 4.16 GTexel/s |
768 GFLOPS | FP32 | 39.36 GFLOPS |
