In Atomfall, the Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Mobile is much faster than the GeForce 210. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Mobile
- Up to 350% faster in Atomfall – 27 vs 6 FPS
- Up to 350% faster in Atomfall
- Is 3 years and 7 months newer – May 27, 2013 vs Oct 12, 2009
- Is 3 years and 7 months newer
- Consumes up to 3% less energy – 30 vs 31 Watts
- Consumes up to 3% less energy
GeForce 210
No clear advantages
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Mobile vs GeForce 210: Comparison of performance and price
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Mobile
May 27th, 2013
Average FPS
27 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
20 FPS
100%
Price, $
...
Value, $/FPS
...
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Mobile vs GeForce 210: Comparison of synthetic benchmarks
Performance Specifications
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Mobile vs GeForce 210: Comparison of core performance specifications
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Mobile
May 27th, 2013
Memory
0 GB
0%
Memory Bandwidth
0 GB/s
0%
Pixel Fillrate
4.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
48 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
768 GFLOPS
100%
GeForce 210
Oct 12th, 2009
Memory
0.5 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
6.4 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
2.08 GPixel/s
43%
Texture Fillrate
4.16 GTexel/s
9%
FP32
39.36 GFLOPS
5%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Mobile May 27th, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | GeForce 210 Oct 12th, 2009 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
May 27th, 2013 | Released | Oct 12th, 2009 |
| – | MSRP | – |
| HD Graphics-M (Haswell) | Generation | GeForce 200 |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
30 W | Power Consumption | 31 W |
