In The Last of Us Part II, the Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Mobile is much slower than the Arc A750. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Mobile
- Consumes up to 87% less energy – 30 vs 225 Watts
- Consumes up to 87% less energy
Arc A750
- Up to 6900% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 70 vs 1 FPS
- Up to 6900% faster in The Last of Us Part II
- Is 9 years and 4 months newer – Oct 12, 2022 vs May 27, 2013
- Is 9 years and 4 months newer
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Mobile vs Arc A750: Comparison of performance and price
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Mobile
May 27th, 2013
Average FPS
1 FPS
1%
Min 1% FPS
1 FPS
2%
Price, $
...
Value, $/FPS
...
All items are out of stock
Arc A750
Oct 12th, 2022
Average FPS
70 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
52 FPS
100%
Price, $
$264.56
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.77/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Mobile vs Arc A750: Comparison of synthetic benchmarks
Performance Specifications
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Mobile vs Arc A750: Comparison of core performance specifications
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Mobile
May 27th, 2013
Memory
0 GB
0%
Memory Bandwidth
0 GB/s
0%
Pixel Fillrate
4.8 GPixel/s
2%
Texture Fillrate
48 GTexel/s
9%
FP32
768 GFLOPS
4%
Arc A750
Oct 12th, 2022
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
512 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
268.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
537.6 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
17.2 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Mobile May 27th, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Arc A750 Oct 12th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| May 27th, 2013 | Released | Oct 12th, 2022 |
| – | MSRP | $289.00 |
| HD Graphics-M (Haswell) | Generation | Alchemist (Arc 7) |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
30 W | Power Consumption | 225 W |
