In Atomfall, the Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Mobile is much slower than the Arc A580. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Mobile
- Consumes up to 83% less energy – 30 vs 175 Watts
- Consumes up to 83% less energy
Arc A580
- Up to 159% faster in Atomfall – 70 vs 27 FPS
- Up to 159% faster in Atomfall
- Is 10 years and 4 months newer – Oct 10, 2023 vs May 27, 2013
- Is 10 years and 4 months newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Mobile vs Arc A580: Comparison of performance and price
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Mobile
May 27th, 2013
Average FPS
27 FPS
39%
Min 1% FPS
20 FPS
38%
Price, $
...
Value, $/FPS
...
All items are out of stock
Arc A580
Oct 10th, 2023
Average FPS
70 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
53 FPS
100%
Price, $
$179.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.57/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Mobile vs Arc A580: Comparison of synthetic benchmarks
Performance Specifications
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Mobile vs Arc A580: Comparison of core performance specifications
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Mobile
May 27th, 2013
Memory
0 GB
0%
Memory Bandwidth
0 GB/s
0%
Pixel Fillrate
4.8 GPixel/s
2%
Texture Fillrate
48 GTexel/s
12%
FP32
768 GFLOPS
6%
Arc A580
Oct 10th, 2023
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
512 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
192 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
384 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
12.29 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Mobile May 27th, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Arc A580 Oct 10th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| May 27th, 2013 | Released | Oct 10th, 2023 |
| – | MSRP | – |
| HD Graphics-M (Haswell) | Generation | Alchemist (Arc 5) |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
30 W | Power Consumption | 175 W |
