In World of Warcraft, the Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Mobile is much slower than the Arc A550M. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Mobile
- Consumes up to 50% less energy – 30 vs 60 Watts
- Consumes up to 50% less energy
Arc A550M
- Up to 134% faster in World of Warcraft – 103 vs 44 FPS
- Up to 134% faster in World of Warcraft
World of Warcraft FPS Calculator
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Mobile vs Arc A550M: Comparison of performance and price
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Mobile
May 27th, 2013
Average FPS
44 FPS
43%
Min 1% FPS
29 FPS
38%
Price, $
...
Value, $/FPS
...
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Mobile vs Arc A550M: Comparison of synthetic benchmarks
Performance Specifications
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Mobile vs Arc A550M: Comparison of core performance specifications
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Mobile
May 27th, 2013
Memory
0 GB
0%
Memory Bandwidth
0 GB/s
0%
Pixel Fillrate
4.8 GPixel/s
4%
Texture Fillrate
48 GTexel/s
18%
FP32
768 GFLOPS
9%
Arc A550M
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
224 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
131.2 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
262.4 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
8.397 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Mobile May 27th, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Arc A550M |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| May 27th, 2013 | Release Date | – |
| – | MSRP | – |
| HD Graphics-M (Haswell) | Generation | Alchemist (Arc 5 Mobile) |
Integrated | Segment | Laptop |
30W | Power Consumption | 60W |
