In Atomfall, the Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Mobile is slower than the Arc A370M. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Mobile
- Consumes up to 14% less energy – 30 vs 35 Watts
- Consumes up to 14% less energy
Arc A370M
- Up to 33% faster in Atomfall – 36 vs 27 FPS
- Up to 33% faster in Atomfall
- Is 8 years and 10 months newer – Mar 30, 2022 vs May 27, 2013
- Is 8 years and 10 months newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Mobile vs Arc A370M: Comparison of performance and price
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Mobile
May 27th, 2013
Average FPS
27 FPS
75%
Min 1% FPS
20 FPS
74%
Price, $
...
Value, $/FPS
...
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Mobile vs Arc A370M: Comparison of synthetic benchmarks
Performance Specifications
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Mobile vs Arc A370M: Comparison of core performance specifications
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Mobile
May 27th, 2013
Memory
0 GB
0%
Memory Bandwidth
0 GB/s
0%
Pixel Fillrate
4.8 GPixel/s
7%
Texture Fillrate
48 GTexel/s
37%
FP32
768 GFLOPS
18%
Arc A370M
Mar 30th, 2022
Memory
4 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
112 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
65.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
131.2 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
4.198 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Mobile May 27th, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Arc A370M Mar 30th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| May 27th, 2013 | Released | Mar 30th, 2022 |
| – | MSRP | – |
| HD Graphics-M (Haswell) | Generation | Alchemist (Arc 3 Mobile) |
Integrated | Segment | Laptop |
30 W | Power Consumption | 35 W |
