In The Last of Us Part II, the Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Mobile is much slower than the Arc A350M. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Mobile
No clear advantages
Arc A350M
- Up to 200% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 3 vs 1 FPS
- Up to 200% faster in The Last of Us Part II
- Is 8 years and 10 months newer – Mar 30, 2022 vs May 27, 2013
- Is 8 years and 10 months newer
- Consumes up to 17% less energy – 25 vs 30 Watts
- Consumes up to 17% less energy
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Mobile vs Arc A350M: Comparison of performance and price
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Mobile
May 27th, 2013
Average FPS
1 FPS
33%
Min 1% FPS
1 FPS
50%
Price, $
...
Value, $/FPS
...
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Mobile vs Arc A350M: Comparison of synthetic benchmarks
Performance Specifications
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Mobile vs Arc A350M: Comparison of core performance specifications
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Mobile
May 27th, 2013
Memory
0 GB
0%
Memory Bandwidth
0 GB/s
0%
Pixel Fillrate
4.8 GPixel/s
9%
Texture Fillrate
48 GTexel/s
45%
FP32
768 GFLOPS
23%
Arc A350M
Mar 30th, 2022
Memory
4 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
112 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
52.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
105.6 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
3.379 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Mobile May 27th, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Arc A350M Mar 30th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| May 27th, 2013 | Released | Mar 30th, 2022 |
| – | MSRP | – |
| HD Graphics-M (Haswell) | Generation | Alchemist (Arc 3 Mobile) |
Integrated | Segment | Laptop |
| 30 W | Power Consumption | 25 W |
