The Iris Plus Graphics 650 is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the Arc A750. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Iris Plus Graphics 650
- Consumes up to 93% less energy – 15 vs 225 Watts
Advantages of the Arc A750
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
Iris Plus Graphics 650 vs Arc A750 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Iris Plus Graphics 650
Jan 3rd, 2017
Average FPS
42
34%
Min 1% FPS
16
23%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Arc A750
Oct 12th, 2022
Average FPS
122
100%
Min 1% FPS
71
100%
Price, $
$272.44
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.23/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
$272.44
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$179.99
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$329.57
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$279.00
In Stock
Iris Plus Graphics 650 vs Arc A750 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Iris Plus Graphics 650 vs Arc A750 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Iris Plus Graphics 650 vs Arc A750 in core GPU performance specifications
Iris Plus Graphics 650
Jan 3rd, 2017
Memory
0 GB
0%
Memory Bandwidth
0 GB/s
0%
Pixel Fillrate
6.9 GPixel/s
3%
Texture Fillrate
55.2 GTexel/s
10%
FP32
883.2 GFLOPS
5%
Arc A750
Oct 12th, 2022
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
512 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
268.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
537.6 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
17.2 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Iris Plus Graphics 650 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Arc A750 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2022 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $289.00 |
| HD Graphics-M | Generation | Alchemist |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
15 W | Power Consumption | 225 W |
| Memory | ||
| System-Shared | Memory Size | 8 GB |
| System-Shared | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| System-Shared | Memory Bus | 256-bit |
| System-Shared | Bandwidth | 512 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 6.9 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 268.8 GPixel/s |
| 55.2 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 537.6 GTexel/s |
| 883.2 GFLOPS | FP32 | 17.2 TFLOPS |
