In Atomfall, the Iris Graphics 5100 Mobile is quite a bit slower than the GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Iris Graphics 5100 Mobile
- Consumes up to 40% less energy – 30 vs 50 Watts
- Consumes up to 40% less energy
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
- Up to 42% faster in Atomfall – 37 vs 26 FPS
- Up to 42% faster in Atomfall
- Is 6 years and 10 months newer – Apr 23, 2020 vs May 27, 2013
- Is 6 years and 10 months newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Iris Graphics 5100 Mobile vs GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile: Comparison of performance and price
Iris Graphics 5100 Mobile
May 27th, 2013
Average FPS
26 FPS
70%
Min 1% FPS
20 FPS
71%
Price, $
...
Value, $/FPS
...
All items are out of stock
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
Apr 23rd, 2020
Average FPS
37 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
28 FPS
100%
Price, $
...
Value, $/FPS
...
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
Iris Graphics 5100 Mobile vs GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile: Comparison of synthetic benchmarks
Performance Specifications
Iris Graphics 5100 Mobile vs GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile: Comparison of core performance specifications
Iris Graphics 5100 Mobile
May 27th, 2013
Memory
0 GB
0%
Memory Bandwidth
0 GB/s
0%
Pixel Fillrate
4.4 GPixel/s
9%
Texture Fillrate
44 GTexel/s
46%
FP32
704 GFLOPS
23%
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
Apr 23rd, 2020
Memory
4 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
192 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
47.52 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
95.04 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
3.041 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Iris Graphics 5100 Mobile May 27th, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile Apr 23rd, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| May 27th, 2013 | Released | Apr 23rd, 2020 |
| – | MSRP | – |
| HD Graphics-M (Haswell) | Generation | GeForce 16 Mobile |
Integrated | Segment | Laptop |
30 W | Power Consumption | 50 W |
