In The Last of Us Part II, the Iris Graphics 5100 Mobile is much slower than the Arc A770. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Iris Graphics 5100 Mobile
- Consumes up to 87% less energy – 30 vs 225 Watts
- Consumes up to 87% less energy
Arc A770
- Up to 7500% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 76 vs 1 FPS
- Up to 7500% faster in The Last of Us Part II
- Is 9 years and 4 months newer – Oct 12, 2022 vs May 27, 2013
- Is 9 years and 4 months newer
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Iris Graphics 5100 Mobile vs Arc A770: Comparison of performance and price
Iris Graphics 5100 Mobile
May 27th, 2013
Average FPS
1 FPS
1%
Min 1% FPS
1 FPS
2%
Price, $
...
Value, $/FPS
...
All items are out of stock
Arc A770
Oct 12th, 2022
Average FPS
76 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
57 FPS
100%
Price, $
$279.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.68/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
Iris Graphics 5100 Mobile vs Arc A770: Comparison of synthetic benchmarks
Performance Specifications
Iris Graphics 5100 Mobile vs Arc A770: Comparison of core performance specifications
Iris Graphics 5100 Mobile
May 27th, 2013
Memory
0 GB
0%
Memory Bandwidth
0 GB/s
0%
Pixel Fillrate
4.4 GPixel/s
1%
Texture Fillrate
44 GTexel/s
7%
FP32
704 GFLOPS
4%
Arc A770
Oct 12th, 2022
Memory
16 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
512 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
307.2 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
614.4 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
19.66 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Iris Graphics 5100 Mobile May 27th, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Arc A770 Oct 12th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| May 27th, 2013 | Released | Oct 12th, 2022 |
| – | MSRP | $329.00 |
| HD Graphics-M (Haswell) | Generation | Alchemist (Arc 7) |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
30 W | Power Consumption | 225 W |
