In Atomfall, the Iris Graphics 5100 Mobile is quite a bit slower than the Arc A380. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Iris Graphics 5100 Mobile
- Consumes up to 60% less energy – 30 vs 75 Watts
- Consumes up to 60% less energy
Arc A380
- Up to 59% faster in Atomfall – 43 vs 27 FPS
- Up to 59% faster in Atomfall
- Is 9 years and 17 days newer – Jun 14, 2022 vs May 27, 2013
- Is 9 years and 17 days newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Iris Graphics 5100 Mobile vs Arc A380: Comparison of performance and price
Iris Graphics 5100 Mobile
May 27th, 2013
Average FPS
27 FPS
63%
Min 1% FPS
20 FPS
62%
Price, $
...
Value, $/FPS
...
All items are out of stock
Arc A380
Jun 14th, 2022
Average FPS
43 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
32 FPS
100%
Price, $
$149.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.48/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
Iris Graphics 5100 Mobile vs Arc A380: Comparison of synthetic benchmarks
Performance Specifications
Iris Graphics 5100 Mobile vs Arc A380: Comparison of core performance specifications
Iris Graphics 5100 Mobile
May 27th, 2013
Memory
0 GB
0%
Memory Bandwidth
0 GB/s
0%
Pixel Fillrate
4.4 GPixel/s
7%
Texture Fillrate
44 GTexel/s
34%
FP32
704 GFLOPS
17%
Arc A380
Jun 14th, 2022
Memory
6 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
186 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
65.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
131.2 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
4.198 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Iris Graphics 5100 Mobile May 27th, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Arc A380 Jun 14th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| May 27th, 2013 | Released | Jun 14th, 2022 |
| – | MSRP | $149.00 |
| HD Graphics-M (Haswell) | Generation | Alchemist (Arc 3) |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
30 W | Power Consumption | 75 W |
