In Deathloop, the Iris Graphics 5100 Mobile is quite a bit slower than the Arc A350M. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Iris Graphics 5100 Mobile
No clear advantages
Arc A350M
- Up to 84% faster in Deathloop – 81 vs 44 FPS
- Up to 84% faster in Deathloop
- Is 8 years and 10 months newer – Mar 30, 2022 vs May 27, 2013
- Is 8 years and 10 months newer
- Consumes up to 17% less energy – 25 vs 30 Watts
- Consumes up to 17% less energy
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Iris Graphics 5100 Mobile vs Arc A350M: Comparison of performance and price
Iris Graphics 5100 Mobile
May 27th, 2013
Average FPS
44 FPS
54%
Min 1% FPS
33 FPS
55%
Price, $
...
Value, $/FPS
...
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
Iris Graphics 5100 Mobile vs Arc A350M: Comparison of synthetic benchmarks
Performance Specifications
Iris Graphics 5100 Mobile vs Arc A350M: Comparison of core performance specifications
Iris Graphics 5100 Mobile
May 27th, 2013
Memory
0 GB
0%
Memory Bandwidth
0 GB/s
0%
Pixel Fillrate
4.4 GPixel/s
8%
Texture Fillrate
44 GTexel/s
42%
FP32
704 GFLOPS
21%
Arc A350M
Mar 30th, 2022
Memory
4 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
112 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
52.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
105.6 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
3.379 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Iris Graphics 5100 Mobile May 27th, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Arc A350M Mar 30th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| May 27th, 2013 | Released | Mar 30th, 2022 |
| – | MSRP | – |
| HD Graphics-M (Haswell) | Generation | Alchemist (Arc 3 Mobile) |
Integrated | Segment | Laptop |
| 30 W | Power Consumption | 25 W |
