Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 280 outperforms UHD Graphics 730 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 280 is 3227 days older than UHD Graphics 730.
Advantages of Intel UHD Graphics 730
- Consumes up to 92% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 280 - 15 vs 200 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 280
- Performs up to 64% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than UHD Graphics 730 - 18 vs 11 FPS
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
UHD Graphics 730
Integrated • Jan 3rd, 2023
Radeon R9 280
Desktop • Mar 4th, 2014
Theoretical Performance
UHD Graphics 730
Integrated • Jan 3rd, 2023
Pixel Fillrate
9.3 GPixel/s
31%
Texel Fillrate
18.6 GTexel/s
17%
Radeon R9 280
Desktop • Mar 4th, 2014
Pixel Fillrate
29.86 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
104.5 GTexel/s
100%
Intel UHD Graphics 730 | vs | AMD Radeon R9 280 |
|---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2023 | Release Date | Mar 4th, 2014 |
| HD Graphics | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
| Not Available | MSRP | $279 |
| Motherboard Dependent | Outputs | 1x DVI, 2x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
| System-Shared | Memory | 3 GB |
| System-Shared | Type | GDDR5 |
| System-Shared | Bus | 384-bit |
| System-Shared | Bandwidth | 240 GB/s |
| 300 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 827 MHz |
1550 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 933 MHz |
| System-Shared | Memory Clock Speed | 1250 MHz |
