Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 280 outperforms UHD Graphics 630 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 280 is 2249 days older than UHD Graphics 630.
Advantages of Intel UHD Graphics 630
- Consumes up to 92% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 280 - 15 vs 200 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 280
- Performs up to 30% better in Monster Hunter: World than UHD Graphics 630 - 60 vs 46 FPS
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
UHD Graphics 630
Integrated • Apr 30th, 2020
Radeon R9 280
Desktop • Mar 4th, 2014
Theoretical Performance
UHD Graphics 630
Integrated • Apr 30th, 2020
Pixel Fillrate
3.45 GPixel/s
11%
Texel Fillrate
26.45 GTexel/s
25%
Radeon R9 280
Desktop • Mar 4th, 2014
Pixel Fillrate
29.86 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
104.5 GTexel/s
100%
Intel UHD Graphics 630 | vs | AMD Radeon R9 280 |
|---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Mar 4th, 2014 |
| HD Graphics | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
| Not Available | MSRP | $279 |
| Motherboard Dependent | Outputs | 1x DVI, 2x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
| System-Shared | Memory | 3 GB |
| System-Shared | Type | GDDR5 |
| System-Shared | Bus | 384-bit |
| System-Shared | Bandwidth | 240 GB/s |
| 350 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 827 MHz |
1150 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 933 MHz |
| System-Shared | Memory Clock Speed | 1250 MHz |
