Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 290X outperforms UHD Graphics 620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 290X is 1769 days older than UHD Graphics 620.
Advantages of Intel UHD Graphics 620
- Consumes up to 95% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 290X - 15 vs 290 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 290X
- Performs up to 32% better in Dead Space than UHD Graphics 620 - 54 vs 41 FPS
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 24th, 2013
FPS
54
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.89/FPS
100%
Price, $
$210
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $210 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6990 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Integrated • Aug 28th, 2018
Desktop • Oct 24th, 2013
Theoretical Performance
Intel UHD Graphics 620 | vs | AMD Radeon R9 290X |
---|---|---|
Aug 28th, 2018 | Release Date | Oct 24th, 2013 |
HD Graphics-M | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
Not Available | MSRP | $549 |
Portable Device Dependent | Outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
System-Shared | Memory | 4 GB |
System-Shared | Type | GDDR5 |
System-Shared | Bus | 512-bit |
System-Shared | Bandwidth | 320 GB/s |
300 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1000 MHz |
1000 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
System-Shared | Memory Clock Speed | 1250 MHz |