Key Differences
In short — Radeon R7 250E outperforms UHD Graphics 605 Mobile on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R7 250E is 1452 days older than UHD Graphics 605 Mobile.
Advantages of Intel UHD Graphics 605 Mobile
- Consumes up to 91% less energy than AMD Radeon R7 250E - 5 vs 55 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R7 250E
- Performs up to 2% better in Far Cry 3 than UHD Graphics 605 Mobile - 131 vs 129 FPS
Far Cry 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
UHD Graphics 605 Mobile
Integrated • Dec 11th, 2017
Radeon R7 250E
Desktop • Dec 20th, 2013
Theoretical Performance
UHD Graphics 605 Mobile
Integrated • Dec 11th, 2017
Pixel Fillrate
2.25 GPixel/s
17.578125%
Texel Fillrate
13.5 GTexel/s
52.734375%
Radeon R7 250E
Desktop • Dec 20th, 2013
Pixel Fillrate
12.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
25.6 GTexel/s
100%
Intel UHD Graphics 605 Mobile | vs | AMD Radeon R7 250E |
|---|---|---|
Dec 11th, 2017 | Release Date | Dec 20th, 2013 |
| HD Graphics-T | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
| Not Available | MSRP | $109 |
| Portable Device Dependent | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | None |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
| System-Shared | Memory | 1 GB |
| System-Shared | Type | GDDR5 |
| System-Shared | Bus | 128-bit |
| System-Shared | Bandwidth | 72 GB/s |
| 200 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 800 MHz |
| 750 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
| System-Shared | Memory Clock Speed | 1125 MHz |
