Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 285 outperforms Iris Xe Graphics G4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 285 is 2192 days older than Iris Xe Graphics G4.
Advantages of Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4
- Consumes up to 92% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 285 - 15 vs 190 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 285
- Performs up to 14% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Iris Xe Graphics G4 - 315 vs 276 FPS
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Iris Xe Graphics G4
Integrated • Sep 2nd, 2020
Radeon R9 285
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Theoretical Performance
Iris Xe Graphics G4
Integrated • Sep 2nd, 2020
Pixel Fillrate
13.2 GPixel/s
44%
Texel Fillrate
26.4 GTexel/s
25%
Radeon R9 285
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Pixel Fillrate
29.38 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
102.8 GTexel/s
100%
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 | vs | AMD Radeon R9 285 |
|---|---|---|
Sep 2nd, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 2nd, 2014 |
| HD Graphics-M | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
| Not Available | MSRP | $249 |
| Portable Device Dependent | Outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | 2x 6-pin |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
| System-Shared | Memory | 2 GB |
| System-Shared | Type | GDDR5 |
| System-Shared | Bus | 256-bit |
| System-Shared | Bandwidth | 176 GB/s |
| 300 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 918 MHz |
| 1100 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
| System-Shared | Memory Clock Speed | 1375 MHz |
