Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 270 outperforms Iris Pro Graphics 580 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 270 is 657 days older than Iris Pro Graphics 580.
Advantages of Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580
- Consumes up to 90% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 270 - 15 vs 150 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 270
- Performs up to 2% better in F1 23 than Iris Pro Graphics 580 - 166 vs 163 FPS
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Iris Pro Graphics 580
Integrated • Sep 1st, 2015
Radeon R9 270
Desktop • Nov 13th, 2013
Theoretical Performance
Iris Pro Graphics 580
Integrated • Sep 1st, 2015
Pixel Fillrate
8.55 GPixel/s
28%
Texel Fillrate
68.4 GTexel/s
92%
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580 | vs | AMD Radeon R9 270 |
|---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Nov 13th, 2013 |
| HD Graphics-M | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
| Not Available | MSRP | $179 |
| Portable Device Dependent | Outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
| System-Shared | Memory | 2 GB |
| System-Shared | Type | GDDR5 |
| System-Shared | Bus | 256-bit |
| System-Shared | Bandwidth | 179.2 GB/s |
| 350 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 900 MHz |
950 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 925 MHz |
| System-Shared | Memory Clock Speed | 1400 MHz |
