Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 980 outperforms Iris Plus Graphics 640 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 980 is 837 days older than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
Advantages of Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640
- Consumes up to 91% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 - 15 vs 165 Watts
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980
- Performs up to 1200% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Iris Plus Graphics 640 - 13 vs 1 FPS
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Sep 19th, 2014
FPS
13
100%
Value, $/FPS
$11.81/FPS
100%
Price, $
$153.5
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $153.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 0 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Integrated • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Sep 19th, 2014
Theoretical Performance
Integrated • Jan 3rd, 2017
Pixel Fillrate
6.6 GPixel/s
8%
Texel Fillrate
52.8 GTexel/s
33%
Desktop • Sep 19th, 2014
Pixel Fillrate
77.82 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
155.6 GTexel/s
100%
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 | vs | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 19th, 2014 |
HD Graphics-M | Generation | GeForce 900 |
Not Available | MSRP | $549 |
Portable Device Dependent | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | 2x 6-pin |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
System-Shared | Memory | 4 GB |
System-Shared | Type | GDDR5 |
System-Shared | Bus | 256-bit |
System-Shared | Bandwidth | 224.4 GB/s |
300 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1127 MHz |
1100 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1216 MHz |
System-Shared | Memory Clock Speed | 1753 MHz |