Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 285 outperforms HD Graphics 620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 285 is 728 days older than HD Graphics 620.
Advantages of Intel HD Graphics 620
- Consumes up to 92% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 285 - 15 vs 190 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 285
- Performs up to 56% better in Cities: Skylines II than HD Graphics 620 - 14 vs 9 FPS
Cities: Skylines II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Integrated • Aug 30th, 2016
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Pixel Fillrate
29.38 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
102.8 GTexel/s
100%
Intel HD Graphics 620 | vs | AMD Radeon R9 285 |
---|---|---|
Aug 30th, 2016 | Release Date | Sep 2nd, 2014 |
HD Graphics-M | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
Not Available | MSRP | $249 |
Portable Device Dependent | Outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | 2x 6-pin |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
System-Shared | Memory | 2 GB |
System-Shared | Type | GDDR5 |
System-Shared | Bus | 256-bit |
System-Shared | Bandwidth | 176 GB/s |
300 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 918 MHz |
1000 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
System-Shared | Memory Clock Speed | 1375 MHz |