Key Differences
In short — HD Graphics 620 outperforms Radeon R5 240 OEM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing HD Graphics 620 is 1033 days newer than Radeon R5 240 OEM.
Advantages of Intel HD Graphics 620
- Consumes up to 70% less energy than AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM - 15 vs 50 Watts
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 1st, 2013
FPS
41
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.34/FPS
100%
Price, $
$54.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $54.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 50720 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Integrated • Aug 30th, 2016
Desktop • Nov 1st, 2013
Theoretical Performance
Integrated • Aug 30th, 2016
Pixel Fillrate
3 GPixel/s
48.07692307692307%
Texel Fillrate
24 GTexel/s
100%
Desktop • Nov 1st, 2013
Pixel Fillrate
6.24 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
18.72 GTexel/s
77.99999999999999%
Intel HD Graphics 620 | vs | AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM |
---|---|---|
Aug 30th, 2016 | Release Date | Nov 1st, 2013 |
HD Graphics-M | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
Portable Device Dependent | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
None | Power Connectors | None |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
System-Shared | Memory | 2 GB |
System-Shared | Type | DDR3 |
System-Shared | Bus | 64-bit |
System-Shared | Bandwidth | 14.4 GB/s |
300 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 730 MHz |
1000 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 780 MHz |
System-Shared | Memory Clock Speed | 900 MHz |