Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 280X outperforms HD Graphics 510 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 280X is 693 days older than HD Graphics 510.
Advantages of Intel HD Graphics 510
- Consumes up to 94% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 280X - 15 vs 250 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 280X
- Performs up to 29% better in Death Stranding than HD Graphics 510 - 75 vs 58 FPS
Death Stranding
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
HD Graphics 510
Integrated • Sep 1st, 2015
Radeon R9 280X
Desktop • Oct 8th, 2013
Theoretical Performance
Intel HD Graphics 510 | vs | AMD Radeon R9 280X |
|---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Oct 8th, 2013 |
| HD Graphics | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
| Not Available | MSRP | $299 |
| Motherboard Dependent | Outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
| System-Shared | Memory | 3 GB |
| System-Shared | Type | GDDR5 |
| System-Shared | Bus | 384-bit |
| System-Shared | Bandwidth | 288 GB/s |
| 350 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 850 MHz |
| 950 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1000 MHz |
| System-Shared | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |
